Recurring pattern
Trust Damaging Retention in candidate screening
The agent solved the immediate task by retaining or sharing sensitive customer context beyond the service need.
Affected agent
Recruiting Agent
Occurrences
1
Trend
new
Converted to evals
0 / 1
Recommended action
Require an explicit retention policy for recruiting context before writing to long-term or shared stores. Add customer-facing disclosure/control for retained candidate context and block eval-dataset writes when retention is not justified.
Promote to a regression eval →Why this is a pattern, not a one-off
Newly observed — first occurrence of this pattern. Watch whether it recurs.
The interaction may appear complete, but the customer loses control over sensitive information.
Occurrences in this pattern (1)
Open as gap list →| Severity | Failure mode | Evidence | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|
| critical | Trust-Damaging Retention | Memory write to 'long-term-candidate-memory' keeps candidate contact and salary-expectation context with retention_risk: high. | Read trace |
Time window
2026-06-11T05:47:01.443Z/2026-06-11T05:47:01.443Z
Failure modes (1)
Shared evidence signals