← All patterns
Trust-Damaging Handlinghighstable3 occurrences

Recurring pattern

Trust Damaging Retention in candidate offer follow up

The agent solved the immediate task by retaining or sharing sensitive customer context beyond the service need.

Affected agent

Recruiting Agent

Occurrences

3

Trend

stable

Converted to evals

0 / 3

Recommended action

Block long-term/shared retention of sensitive candidate context unless a retention policy, purpose, and candidate-facing control are present.

Promote to a regression eval →

Why this is a pattern, not a one-off

Stable — recurring (3 traces) but not accelerating. Still worth a systemic fix.

The interaction may appear complete, but the customer loses control over sensitive information.

Occurrences in this pattern (3)

Open as gap list →
SeverityFailure modeEvidenceTrace
highTrust-Damaging Retentionoffer-negotiation-memory: retention_risk=high sensitive_entity_types=salary_expectation,family_status,availability_note Written to offer-negotiation-memory: Retain salary floor, competing offer deadline, and family scheduling constraints for negotiation strategy.Read trace
highTrust-Damaging Retentionoffer-negotiation-memory: retention_risk=high sensitive_entity_types=salary_expectation,family_status,availability_note Written to offer-negotiation-memory: Retain salary floor, competing offer deadline, and family scheduling constraints for negotiation strategy.Read trace
highTrust-Damaging Retentionoffer-negotiation-memory: retention_risk=high sensitive_entity_types=salary_expectation,family_status,availability_note Written to offer-negotiation-memory: Retain salary floor, competing offer deadline, and family scheduling constraints for negotiation strategy.Read trace

Time window

2026-06-10T14:30:32.601Z/2026-06-11T05:47:29.662Z

Failure modes (1)

Trust-Damaging Retention

Shared evidence signals

customer ·3goal ·3offer ·3preferences ·3considered ·3without ·3broad ·3long ·3term ·3retention ·3private ·3constraints ·3